Peter Lawlor - Labor for Southport PO Box 340
Chirn Park
Queensland 4215
Tel: 5532 5068
Fax: 5532 0394
email: southport@parliament.qld.gov.au
Labour
Working For You
nav_tl nav_top nav_tr
nav_bl nav_b nav_br
Member Of Parliament
nav_tl space nav_tr
space

Insulation Companies

Posted by editor (editor) on Jul 22 2010
2010 >>

 

Asked on 11 March 2010

MR STEVENS ASKED THE MINISTER FOR TOURISM AND FAIR TRADING (MR LAWLOR) —

QUESTION:

With reference to my question in estimates in July 2009 in relation to the number of prosecutions of dodgy insulation companies and also the Minister’s answer in Parliament on 24 February 2010 that 208 complaints have been received—

How many insulation companies have actually been prosecuted as a result of these complaints?

ANSWER:

The complaints received by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) on insulation companies have related to a range of matters including:

-

door-to-door trading

false and misleading representations

contractual disputes about the quality or completeness of work or service provided

discrepancy on quoted costs and actual costs charged

fraud against the Commonwealth

electrical safety and safety practices, and

workplace/employment issues.

Depending upon the nature and seriousness of identified offences under fair trading legislation, the Office of Fair Trading has a range of enforcement options available to it. While no court prosecutions have been commenced, appropriate enforcement action has been taken against insulation companies including:

-

One enforceable undertaking obtained due to a company claiming to be established for longer than it actually had been

Six infringement notices issued to four companies for non-compliance with door-to-door trading provisions and business names breaches, and

Three warnings issued to three companies for asserting right to payment, making misleading representations that goods are of a particular composition, and falsely representing the rebate amount in advertising when the rebate changed from $1600 to $1200.

Where it is clear the complaint falls outside the OFT’s jurisdiction, OFT promptly refers the matter to the relevant agency. However, on some occasions it may be necessary for OFT to investigate the complaint in order to identify the agency responsible before referring the matter accordingly.

For your information, the outcomes of the 208 complaints received were: Complaints were resolved or redress obtained

111

Complaints referred to other agencies

32

OFT was unable to assist *

21

Complaint outside OFT’s jurisdiction, unrelated to OFT’s legislative mandate, or requiring the consumer to seek independent legal advice

17

Complaint lodged for information only

10

Complaints withdrawn

10

Trader cannot be contacted or in liquidation

7

Last changed: Jul 22 2010 at 11:41 AM

Back
space
nav_bl spacer nav_br